Jazz were 17-16 before they got Korvor. They are 15-2 since. Is that a coincidence, or is this the benefits of spreading the floor more with 3s? Just curious.
I founda funny picture of Korvor for this, but can't get it to stick.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
i don't believe 17-16 is indicative of how good this team really was before korver showed up (i'm pretty biased- i love Carlos/Deron), but you're right-they've been on a tear ever since he got signed. i think this is a perfect example of a good fit for a good guy. he's playing better for UTA than he ever did in PHI, and he still isn't playing full minutes.
their only 2 losses since his arrival have been @ POR and @ DEN, and if i'm a jazz fan (ahem), those are acceptable losses at this point.
GO UTAH!
I think Utah's schedule has been pretty cushy lately and that has some part of it.
Though Korvor has been a really good addition, I think their recent success is due to mid season gelling an easier schedule.
So, I said their schedule has been easier lately. Here is their last 14 wins.
5 road games
9 home games
5 east teams
9 west teams
7 vs < .500
7 vs > .500
After looking at it, I guess their schedule hasn't been that easy. But it wasn't that hard either.
Dunno.
vs Indiana W 111-89
vs Phoenix W 108-86
vs Orlando W 119-115
vs Milwaukee W 98-87
@ Denver L 109-120
vs LA Clippers W 106-88
@ LA Clippers W 109-93
vs Sacramento W 127-113
@ Houston W 97-89
vs San Antonio W 97-91
vs New York W 100-89
@ Washington W 96-87
@ Memphis W 110-91
vs New Orleans W 110-88
@ Denver W 118-115
Post a Comment