am i the only one (besides patrick) that thinks dirk didn't deserve the MVP?
i'm looking at the stats and it just doesn't add up. they just picked the guy with the most ppg on the team with the best record, right?
is that what MVP means? i think it is clear he had a good/great year on a good/great team, but come on... there's unarguably(sp?) guys with better stats and judging from the first round, there's better teams. so...
did he deserve it? if so, why do you think so?
if not, who did? why?
2 comments:
I say Steve, LeBron or Kobe. Although LeBron should have won last year when he had even more ridiculous numbers.
Yeah... I think Lebron deserved it last year too.
I think many of the voters though, think Dirk actually deserved it last year and this was his consolation prize.
Steve should have got it again this year but he's not widely considered a basketball legend and I don't think most could stomach giving 3 consecutive MVPs [for the first time EVER] to someone not named Larry, Magic, or Mike.
Post a Comment